I am no fan of Donald Trump who is bad news for the Republican Party (and US politics more generally) so I hesitate to give his candidacy any more attention. He is entertaining, however, and I thought I'd post this content analysis of his tweets below as a pedagogical example of how one goes about conducting content/discourse analysis, and in particular, gauging "tone" (something I also do for my own research on Congressional statements on the North Korean regime). Making sense of movements, rebellions, and revolutions (with occasional comments on East Asia, North Korea, and military bases!)
Showing posts with label methods. Show all posts
Showing posts with label methods. Show all posts
Friday, December 25, 2015
Content Analysis of Donald Trump Tweets
I am no fan of Donald Trump who is bad news for the Republican Party (and US politics more generally) so I hesitate to give his candidacy any more attention. He is entertaining, however, and I thought I'd post this content analysis of his tweets below as a pedagogical example of how one goes about conducting content/discourse analysis, and in particular, gauging "tone" (something I also do for my own research on Congressional statements on the North Korean regime).
Labels:
American politics,
discourse,
elections,
methods,
North Korea,
Trump,
twitter
Sunday, July 26, 2015
The Iran Nuclear Deal: Historical Lessons
Friday's Washington Post published two op-eds using historical cases to support (Phil Gordon) or counter (Fred Kagan) the viability of the Iranian nuclear deal. Political scientists conduct qualitative case study analysis might be pleased to see such arguments. But taken together, the articles suggest that one may pick and choose historical analogies to prove a point, making the logic of any comparison indeterminate. Not sure if this is good or bad for doing comparative historical case study analysis.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)